FROM.MY Editorial Policy for Accurate Financial Content
Read the FROM.MY standards for sourcing, corrections, automation, review dates and useful financial content.
Quality control starts before publication
Each page needs a specific reader task, original value, accurate sources and a review trail. Weak or near-duplicate pages are improved rather than multiplied.
People-first scope
Every page must help someone understand or make a decision about income. We do not publish search-only pages, copied summaries, location swaps or pages that promise functionality they do not provide.
Sources and review
Jurisdiction-specific claims require a current primary source that applies to the stated audience. Each article needs a descriptive title and matching H1 topic, accurate anchor text, a clear review date and practical value beyond restating a source.
Required original value
A publishable page must contribute a working calculation, comparison framework, recordkeeping method, worked example, edge-case explanation or another useful element specific to the reader's task.
Programmatic page controls
Shared templates may control layout and accessibility, but the primary answer, method, limits, examples and related decisions must be page-specific. Near-duplicate content is blocked rather than scheduled.
Automation and imported content
Automation may assist drafting, formatting and scheduling. It does not replace identity checks, source validation, duplicate prevention or publication review.
Commercial independence
A commercial or referral relationship will be disclosed close to the relevant link. Compensation cannot determine a calculator result or remove a material limitation.
Review records
A published financial claim should be traceable to its source, review date, jurisdiction boundary and calculation context. A page is not considered reviewed merely because it renders correctly or passes an automated metadata test.
Corrections and material changes
Material corrections update the affected explanation, calculator assumption and related internal links together. The publication date remains separate from the date of a substantive content review, and the reason for the correction remains traceable.
Importer publication gate
Imported or assisted content must pass topic, originality, source, structure, internal-link and duplicate checks before release. A page is rejected when it merely swaps a location, amount or keyword into an existing answer.
Third-party and commercial content
FROM.MY does not rent folders, subdomains or ranking signals to unrelated publishers. Any future referral must remain inside the site's subject, add independent value and disclose the relationship near the link. Paid placement cannot determine a conclusion or bypass the publication gate.
How automation and AI may be used
Automation may assist with drafting, formatting, sanitisation, duplicate detection, link checks, test execution and release scheduling. It cannot substitute for a relevant page purpose, applicable evidence, a reproducible calculation or useful analysis. Readers should be able to identify the assumptions and limits without trusting an unexplained output.
Human publication responsibility
The publication remains responsible for source selection, page scope, corrections and the decision to release a page. Automated content cannot approve itself, invent credentials, claim testing that did not happen or turn a generic answer into jurisdiction-specific advice.
Key points
Human review
Automation cannot replace source checks, page purpose or correction decisions.Correction chain
A rate change must update the calculator, guide and methodology together.
See the calculations in the FROM.MY methodology and the publication identity on the About page.